Hi ppc64el porters, Sean,@porters, can you please have a look at the ppc64el autopkgtest regressions caused by sbcl [1]?
On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote:
I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream aren't able to reproduce it. I don't think it makes sense to block sbcl's migration on this. I think that either we should ignore the cl-ironclad test failure on ppc64el or remove sbcl on that architecture, if you think that would be warranted.
cl-ironclad *and* cl-postmodern. And the error is identical: no size function for object at 0x100009bf80 (widetag 0x33)
Please let me know if you would be okay with overriding the test failure.
I assuming you didn't contact the ppc64el porters yet (apologies if you did). Shall we give them a chance to investigate?
Paul [1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sbcl
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
