On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:58:03PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > As per the discussions during debconf, to be called "official",
And the rules for "unofficial" would be? At least I can't remember anything about wanting to use the label "official", only the name and logo. > As per the discussions during debconf, to be called "official", the > images have to be built: > - directly from an unmodified stable So the OpenStack images fail, as the script modifies and removes files. > Best would also be if the images could be built together with the rest > of the debian-cd infrastructure. Debian (including debian-cd) infrastructure can't be used for payed work. Also none of the built stuff is updated regulary with security fixes. Bastian -- Ahead warp factor one, Mr. Sulu.
