On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 09:23:27PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:05:57PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:25:25PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > >> We have carried a major.minor scheme as a release numbering scheme > >> since the Early Days, > >[..] > >> So, for the past years we have had x.0.y with growing `y' for point > >> releases, and skiping to (x+1).0.0. And the zero in the middle carries > >> no meaning anymore. > > > >On a related note, if we want dots, sub versions to be meaninful, using > >them in the ISO name scheme as well may help. > > > >Many people downloaded Debian 505 recently. > > > >See #506489. > > That's not the bug you're thinking of, surely?
Erm, #547418 > But yes, I agree - I'm happy to rename the CDs to include the dots in > the version number. AFAIK the only reason not to do that previously > was a scare story about broken filename handling in old versions of > Windows. Not something I care about any more... > > Code change is in debian-cd svn as of ~2 minutes ago... -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100914203002.gd8...@dedibox.ebzao.info
