On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:06:14PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 14:30 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> For the last few builds, the i386/amd64/powerpc sid netinst image has >> become too big to fit on one CD any more. The following packages are >> falling off onto a second disk now: >> >> i386:main:linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem:27213342 >> i386:main:linux-image-2.6-686-bigmem:3036 >> i386:main:linux-headers-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem:516338 >> i386:main:linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem:2930 > >The linux-image ones were added to support installation into a Xen PV >domain and were added to this image precisely because it was one of the >few images which was considered to have room -- it would be a shame to >have to drop them.
Hmmm, OK. >> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/20100615-5/multi-arch/list-cd/debian-testing-amd64-i386-powerpc-netinst.list.gz >> >> in case anybody wants to take a look and suggest things... > >I'm afraid I don't have any good ideas. Is this particular image >supposed to contain a complete base system or just enough to fetch the >remainder of the base system from the net? The netinsts are meant to have the base system, yes. I can't see anything obvious myself that we can drop. Maybe time to give up on powerpc on that image, like we've done on the m-a DVD. Shame, but there's only so much stuff we can accommodate here. Anybody else have an opinion here? Frans/Joey? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100616131436.gg30...@einval.com
