On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > There are still things to decide, and IMO consensus on this should be > reached soon! > - The naming of the etch+1/2 kernel meta packages is now suddenly essential > for the installer and should thus be decided on ASAP. > - There has as yet been no discussion about exactly which "Etch + Lenny D-I" > CD images to create and exactly what should be included on them [3]. > (Hell, the whole "Etch + Lenny D-I" concept hasn't even really been OKed.) > Because of mirror space issues _and_ because of required preparations on > the debian-cd side this _really_ needs to be discussed with Sledge > urgently.
Sledge et al, what's your take on the "Etch + Lenny D-I" concept for cd images? > [3] IMO we can do this only for selected arches, possibly only either > netinst CD + full CD _or_ netinst CD + DVD, and with sets limited > to only the first image. no strong opinion here (being familiar with neither their relative popularity, or the image building restrictions). -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
