On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:26:54AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: >> For now I'm going to leave the sparc images as they are. If there's no >> way to test, then I'm going to wait until the boot-sparc script is >> known to work. I'll work on the easier architectures first. > >I know they wont work, because isofs.b doesn't work like cd.b did, and >you used a mkisofs that that was expecting that.
No, I didn't, In the end I've used a woody mkisofs and the woody silo. If _they_ don't work together, then things are screwed altogether. That's how the r0 and r1 images are made, as far as I know. Yes or no? >So you are telling me that the problem is that you are pulling stuff >from unstable, and using unstable to build, and things are failing >because of that? If so, then that's your mistake, not mine. Build on >woody, and point to a woody mirror, not unstable. I can imagine the >amount of problems you would have building that way. <sigh> A mirror is a mirror. It's getting ludicrous to expect people to set up a completely separate woody-only mirror to build CDs. All the other architectures work fine in this scenario. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] You lock the door And throw away the key There's someone in my head but it's not me
pgpYjCXxqlkGe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
