On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote: >On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>jigdo/ >> current -> 3.0r3 >> 3.0r3/ >> alpha/ >> arm/ >> ... >> >>to >> >>jigdo/ >> current -> 3.0r3 >> 3.0r3/ >> cd/ >> alpha/ >> arm/ >> ... >> dvd >> alpha/ >> arm/ >> ... >> alpha -> cd/alpha >> arm -> cd/arm >> ... > >Hmm.. If you link current to 3.0r3/cd/ instead, that would probably work >with my cd-mirror script as it is. I have been meaning to rewrite it to be >more smart about what isos are available on cdimage.d.o, but i haven't >gotten around to it. It currently makes the rather stupid assumption that >it should run jigdo-mirror on everything in the "current" directory.
ah, OK. No problem, I can put them in where you suggest. >>>> 2. As these will chew up a _lot_ of space, I'm assuming nobody will >>>> want to host full ISOs...? >>> >>>IIRC the consensus was that for sarge, full DVD images would be available >>>on cdimage for i386 only. We could do the same for woody r3, though - what >>>do you think, Mattias? >> >>The fun bit is that we have 1 and 1_NONUS versions of all the woody >>DVDs too... :-/ > >That space calculation was based on dropping the woody images to make >place for some sarge DVDs. Also, I haven't patched/fixed apache, so it >does not have large file support. This also goes for several of the >mirrors that I have talked to. Which makes it a moot point then. OK, I'll put the DVD jigdos _only_ into place tonight on cdimage and open. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
