On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:07:50 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I think the thing to do, at least on full debian CDs will be to do as we
> did with 2.4 for sarge, and use isolinux to have an alternate boot
> method for 2.6 ("linux26"). We're producing only isolinux initrd images
> for 2.6 so far (haven't squeezed it onto a 2.88 mb el-torito floppy
> yet). We could also have 2.6 as default on some cd other than #1.Heh, flashbacks of bf2.4 vs. idepci... > Anyway, maybe it doesn't make sense to combine 2.6 and 2.4 kernels on a > netinst iso -- these isos are meant to be small and minimal download > time, and why download a kernel you won't need? Would it be ok to > produce two sets of businesscard and netinst isos, one with 2.4 and one > with 2.6? It's fine IMO. The official binary CDs should definitely contain both kernels though. -- Joshua Kwan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
