On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Joey Hess wrote: > Mattias Wadenstein wrote: > > Well, that thing has been more or less recommended on this list as I > > understand it for sites without the restrictions that apply to the non-us > > images. I just carry both versions though, less hassle that way. > > If it's accepted I can make the script stop checking sizes (or hack in > some kind of symlink detection). It strikes me as a very bad idea to > make the user randomly get the non-us version with the name that > indicates it is the us version though. That can make for very confusing > bug reports if the non-us version breaks something.
Well, the non-us one is considered the real one, it is supposed to be that image, just that some sites in the US might want to carry a different version. > > Well, looks good. Perhaps extrating the number of the latest version > > instead of just the binary check of "has 3.0_r0"? And perhaps a check of > > incomplete sets (just i386). Or perhaps those are the RFEs for version > > 2.0. :) > > I might improve it for 3.0_r1, since the difference between r0 and r1 > will not be a big deal for many people when getting cd's. I'm only > checking the first cd, but the code can have the names and sizes of all > the other cd's added to it in the configuration section. I suspect most > people want only one cd. I may add a check for source cd's. Yeah, that might be nice. It is probably more important to get this up and running though. /Mattias Wadenstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
