On 3 May 2002, Philip Hands wrote: > Does anyone know if that the result of tweaks to debian-cd that have not > been folded into CVS, or is it simply that sizes of packages have > changed so that debian-cd simply decided to split the groups of packages > up differently on these latest tests? > Part of the problem is that ../tasks/tasks-woody have been sorted diabolically (or is it alphabolically) and end up on the first two CDs in that order. What I am doing is to nominate the order which I want the tasks to go onto the CDs, then build the list of packages from the list and do _not_ sort them. It improves the first two CDs.
However, the first two CDs are involved and there is no way round this. I built a CD set with only the base packages and tasks-woody and went well into the second CD. This means that the minimum CD purchase is two discs for a newbie. Phil. -- Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand +64 3 488 2818 Fax +64 3 488 2875 Mobile 025 267 9420 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred. [EMAIL PROTECTED] I sell GNU/Linux & GNU/Hurd CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]