On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 04:34:52PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:20:03PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: [http-ftp bullet mentioning jigdo] > > > Maybe it's better not to mention it at all, so that we don't > > > interrupt the reader's scanning and let them parse through all > > > of the items? > > > > Hm, maybe. OTOH, that unknown word may make them curious and > > ensure they read on. :) > > It seems the best thing would be to decide finally if we're going to > push jigdo or not. We can't have it recommended and mark it > <strong>beta</strong>, that's an oxymoron, at least in Debian. :)
True! :) <sigh> - but it's a difficult decision. I'd tend towards *not* pushing it for now, *but* that means that HTTP/FTP downloads are going to be used instead, and apparently the mirror admins won't like that. :-( What do other people on the list think? I'm not sure about this at all. > > You have made *lots* of little changes in *lots* of places without > > asking. > > Is that a bad thing or a good thing? :) Um... :-/ :-\ ;-7 > > I'm sorry, but I'm still very much of the opinion that > > - the extra /CD/images/ page is wrong and should disappear > > - ditto (mostly) with /CD/ Heh, interesting quoting there, I don't remember saying that! ;-) > Right. I'll move everything under /CD/. And, to suit my sense of > logic, set up a symlink images/ -> . Okay? :) OK, many thanks! Cheers, Richard -- __ _ |_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key: | \/�| http://atterer.net | Universit�t M�nchen, Germany | 0x888354F7 � '` � -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
