Hello, > Thus far the .deb package organization on the CDs has reflected the > situation in the main archive -- which was the logical choice. However > now that we're going to have package pools, we might want to > reconsider this. Currently section-based ordering is used, so there's > for example binary-i386/admin/ through binary-i386/x11/. But, > following the pool model, there could also be binary-i386/a/ through > binary-i386/z/, and in those directories either all packages starting > with that letter (with "special" lib* handling) or subdirectories > based on source package name (most of which would only contain one > single file). Could somebody enlighten me what was wrong with the old "model" of handling packages in directories? Why was the pool model necessary? I'm just wondering, not flaming :) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technical College of Budapest (BMF.HU) @work: +361 210 1415 (194) H-1084 Budapest, Tavaszmezo u. 15-17. cell.: +3630 306 6758 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
