Your message dated Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:17:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#415670: Postfix package 2.3.8-2 broken (etch)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: postfix
Version: 2.3.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi, after upgrading postfix to 2.3.8-2 this morning, I have noticed that
postfix no longer accepts incoming smtp connections.
In the log I see this:
Mar 21 10:25:12 moto postfix/master[28011]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 28032 exit status 127
Mar 21 10:25:12 moto postfix/master[28011]: warning:
/usr/lib/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
After downgrading to previous version, mail is accepted again.
Cheers, Gabor
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages postfix depends on:
ii adduser 3.102 Add and remove users and groups
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii dpkg 1.13.25 package maintenance system for Deb
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libdb4.3 4.3.29-8 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [
ii libsasl2-2 2.1.22.dfsg1-8 Authentication abstraction library
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8c-4 SSL shared libraries
ii lsb-base 3.1-23.1 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii netbase 4.29 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii ssl-cert 1.0.14 Simple debconf wrapper for openssl
Versions of packages postfix recommends:
ii mailx [mail-read 1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent
ii mutt [mail-reade 1.5.13-1.1 text-based mailreader supporting M
-- debconf information:
postfix/root_address:
postfix/rfc1035_violation: false
postfix/master_upgrade_warning:
postfix/mydomain_warning:
postfix/mynetworks: 127.0.0.1/32 84.1.230.166/32
postfix/db_upgrade_warning: true
* postfix/mailname: moto.motoros.eu
postfix/tlsmgr_upgrade_warning:
postfix/dynamicmaps_upgrade_warning:
postfix/recipient_delim: +
* postfix/main_mailer_type: Internet Site
postfix/destinations: $myhostname localhost.$mydomain localhost $mydomain
motoros-friends.hu www.$mydomain www.motoros-friends.hu
postfix/transport_map_warning:
postfix/nqmgr_upgrade_warning:
postfix/not_configured:
postfix/mailbox_limit: 0
postfix/relayhost:
postfix/procmail: true
postfix/bad_recipient_delimiter:
postfix/protocols: all
postfix/chattr: false
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Joerg,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:55:52AM +0100, Joerg Platte wrote:
> I have the same problem. strace reports a problem with a library:
> [pid 30353] writev(2, [{"smtpd", 5}, {": ", 2}, {"relocation error", 16},
> {": ", 2}, {"/usr/lib/libpostfix-tls.so.1", 28}, {": ", 2}, {"symbol
> SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb, "..., 114}, {"", 0}, {"", 0}, {"\n", 1}], 10) = 170
Thanks, this was the key. It turns out the maintainer uploaded the
postfix/i386 binaries built against a wrong, broken version of libssl-dev,
with the result that the package works fine with the version of libssl0.9.8
in unstable but not with the version in testing.
I've scheduled a binNMU to get postfix rebuilt against the current
libssl-dev, so this ought to be fixed in testing within 36 hours with no
further maintainer action required. I'm therefore closing the bug report
now.
Lamont, please be sure to update your build environment to the current
libssl-dev as well.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--- End Message ---
