On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:51:24PM +0100, Nicola Manini wrote: > > What's the purpose of this bug that isn't already achieved by #413469?
> Julien, #413469 was correctly downgraded to wishlist, since that bug is > only about "The package is outdated", "this package is outdated to the point of unreleasability" is a perfectly valid *serious* bug. > i.e. the developer wished to push a fresher snapshot into etch No, the developer specified that the snapshot should be updated *and that etch should continue to track upstream development*, which is obviously a) not resolved by having one particular newer snapshot in experimental, and b) not going to happen. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
