On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:02:59PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > >Discussing with Marco on IRC, it seems he's reluctant to have inetd running > >when no services are configured, but it's clear in any case that > >update-inted doesn't need to restart inetd on service removal/deactivation: > >a force-reload is always sufficient, because either inetd is running and a > >reload does what's expected, or inetd isn't running and there's no reason > >to > >start it.
> >So attached is a patch that changes this aspect of update-inetd's behavior. > >It doesn't completely resolve the issues described here (as noted, the > >problem can occur on package configuration, just not on package removal), > >but is nevertheless correct in its own right. > >NMU on its way shortly to incoming with this change, per Marco's standing > >NMU policy for this package. > I can't see the NMUed package neither in the DELAYED queue nor in the NEW > queue. Have you uploaded the NMUed package? The NMU /of update-inetd/ is already in unstabel. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
