Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Thijs,
>
> I really don't understand why this bug should be considered 'grave'.
Thank you for your interest, Steve. The bug has been patched anyway :-)
Seems to be working, so I will proceed to ask for an sponsored upload
soon, along with some additional translations.
Thijs, wanna sponsor that ?
> The
> explanation of the provided patch is that imapproxy segfaults /when the
> server isn't listening/; I've configured imapproxy here to test, and it
> starts fine for me when pointed at my imap server. Yes, it crashes for me
> if I instead configure it to look at a non-existent (or down) server, but
> does that make the package unusable?
>
In fact not, but a SEGFAULT is always a severe thing, so we'd better fix
it if possible.
I will be forwarding this patch upstream, so that it can be merged and
released along future releases.
Meanwhile, let's make this the best release ever :-)
Cheers,
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
