Your message dated Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:02:02 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409554: fixed in fuse 2.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sshfs
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: normal
After some time of use, the mount point dies. Luckly it can be unmounted and
mounted again without problems. It seems to happen randomly as forcing the
crash is a matter of accessing the remote system and wait for it, without
any clue about if it happens with big files, lots of files in same dir or
other obvious conditions. I tried sshfs -d and here are the last lines:
---8<---
READ[136514536] 32768 bytes from 24576
READ[136514536] 32768 bytes
unique: 32818, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 32784
unique: 32819, opcode: READ (15), nodeid: 7650, insize: 64
READ[136514536] 65536 bytes from 57344
READ[136514536] 65536 bytes
unique: 32819, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 65552
unique: 32820, opcode: READ (15), nodeid: 7650, insize: 64
READ[136514536] 16384 bytes from 122880
READ[136514536] 15370 bytes
unique: 32820, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 15386
unique: 32821, opcode: FLUSH (25), nodeid: 7650, insize: 64
FLUSH[136514536]
unique: 32821, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 16
unique: 32822, opcode: RELEASE (18), nodeid: 7650, insize: 56
RELEASE[136514536] flags: 0x800
sshfs: fuse.c:1663: fuse_release: Assertion `node->open_count > 0' failed.
Aborted
--->8---
And here the end lines of another try, which took more time, but crashed
anyway:
---8<---
OPEN[135062152] flags: 0x800
unique: 68692, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 32
unique: 68693, opcode: FLUSH (25), nodeid: 8048, insize: 64
FLUSH[135062152]
unique: 68693, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 16
unique: 68694, opcode: RELEASE (18), nodeid: 8048, insize: 56
RELEASE[135062152] flags: 0x800
unique: 68694, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 16
unique: 68695, opcode: LOOKUP (1), nodeid: 7873, insize: 55
LOOKUP /mnt/inet-images/www.moonkatz.org/mbarrettart/hoverbikes.jpg
NODEID: 8049
unique: 68695, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 136
unique: 68696, opcode: OPEN (14), nodeid: 8049, insize: 48
OPEN[135062152] flags: 0x800
unique: 68696, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 32
unique: 68697, opcode: FLUSH (25), nodeid: 8049, insize: 64
FLUSH[135062152]
unique: 68697, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 16
unique: 68698, opcode: RELEASE (18), nodeid: 8049, insize: 56
RELEASE[135062152] flags: 0x800
unique: 68698, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 16
unique: 68699, opcode: LOOKUP (1), nodeid: 7873, insize: 56
LOOKUP /mnt/inet-images/www.moonkatz.org/mbarrettart/hoverhybrid.jpg
NODEID: 8050
unique: 68699, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 136
unique: 68700, opcode: OPEN (14), nodeid: 8050, insize: 48
OPEN[135062152] flags: 0x800
unique: 68700, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 32
unique: 68701, opcode: FLUSH (25), nodeid: 8050, insize: 64
FLUSH[135062152]
unique: 68701, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 16
unique: 68702, opcode: RELEASE (18), nodeid: 8050, insize: 56
RELEASE[135062152] flags: 0x800
sshfs: fuse.c:1663: fuse_release: Assertion `node->open_count > 0' failed.
Aborted
--->8---
After the crash one gets things like:
---8<---
ls: .: Transport endpoint is not connected
--->8---
It seems to have started to happen since libfuse2 and fuse-utils
moved from 2.5.3-4.1 to 2.6.2-1 some days ago. Before, with same usage
pattern, worked fine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages sshfs depends on:
ii fuse-utils 2.6.2-1 Filesystem in USErspace (utilities
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libfuse2 2.6.2-1 Filesystem in USErspace library
ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.6-2 The GLib library of C routines
sshfs recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: fuse
Source-Version: 2.6.3-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fuse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
fuse-utils_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse-utils_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
fuse_2.6.3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.6.3-1.diff.gz
fuse_2.6.3-1.dsc
to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.6.3-1.dsc
fuse_2.6.3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/fuse/fuse_2.6.3.orig.tar.gz
libfuse-dev_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse-dev_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
libfuse2_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/f/fuse/libfuse2_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fuse package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:35:29 +0100
Source: fuse
Binary: libfuse2 libfuse-dev fuse-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
fuse-utils - Filesystem in USErspace (utilities)
libfuse-dev - Filesystem in USErspace (development files)
libfuse2 - Filesystem in USErspace library
Closes: 388693 409554 409644 410032
Changes:
fuse (2.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=HIGH
.
* Urgency set to HIGH as it fixes a critical and a serious bug.
* Added myself to uploaders in agreement with Bartosz.
* New upstream release (Closes: #409554, #410032).
* Create a versioned shlibs file (Closes: #409644).
* Fix package version in fuse-utils.postinst and do not remove override in
postrm (Closes: #388693).
* Add watch file.
Files:
7f1e2b170cee632143fd5060073bc6de 657 libs optional fuse_2.6.3-1.dsc
3f4f5d07d12dedc0a3fd23472171fe94 473147 libs optional fuse_2.6.3.orig.tar.gz
0ac0a510c27fdefc16b0c788323ddf86 8818 libs optional fuse_2.6.3-1.diff.gz
eb1d246f1d61a66daae6e0866d293470 71562 utils optional
fuse-utils_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
ee92be822e32634cc5505d665c0c42ba 122890 libdevel optional
libfuse-dev_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
c6d7dc31b16d7edfbb10b8ad7f7b1be9 68396 libs optional libfuse2_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF6rEb+C5cwEsrK54RAjX1AJ9bhHg9pIajUOtmwz4dwhWCoxNx9gCdFYMi
7mmU/9nlD2MZ0S4hQ7MWRvU=
=d93y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
