Hi,
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 11:52:26 -0500, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:48:56AM -0600, you wrote:
>> OK. So where does that leave us at the moment? The first bug
>> closing message said:
>>> This wasn't duplicated for any other arch, and this plaform
>>> apparantly hasn't even tried building the last two uploads. I'm
>>> going to assume it was a platform-specific build environment bug
>>> unless there's further information provided.
>>
>> which implies that the maintainer does not seem to support the s390
>> architecture (well, my read of that mail).
> Yes, the maintainer is so uncaring of s390 that he didn't log in to
> raptor to try to build things manually to reproduce various issues
> on s390 (and couldn't, which is how 5.97-5 got into the archive--I
> got tired of waiting for the s390 buildd, built it manually without
> problems, and uploaded it.)
Sorry :)
>> Where do we go from here?
> Build it manually on raptor and upload it?
Done.
> Or figure out why the s390 buildd behaves differently than all the
> others?
I see there is a fix in the bug report now. Do you want to
create a -6 package, or do you want me to try -5.3 NMU?
manoj
--
The sun never sets on those who ride into it. RKO
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
