Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:23:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gv: version 3.6.1-10sarge1 is effectively identical to 3.6.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gv
Version: 1:3.6.1-10sarge1
Although gv_3.6.1-10sarge1 claims to fix bug 398292, the only change in
the package, at least in the i386 architecture, is a new entry in the
changelog. All other files, including the binary executable, are
identical to the previous version.
Apparently, the fact that the patch file (CVE-2006-5864.patch) is called
*.patch rather than *.diff prevents it from being used in the build.
Possible solution: rename debian/patches/CVE-2006-5864.patch to
CVE-2006-5864.diff and rebuild.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:3.6.1-10sarge2
Re: Xavier Perramon 2006-12-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Apparently, the fact that the patch file (CVE-2006-5864.patch) is called
> *.patch rather than *.diff prevents it from being used in the build.
Hi Xavier,
thanks for spotting, this was fixed with DSA 1214-2.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
