On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:07:30PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > The new upstream version uploaded to unstable includes a significant number > > of changes unrelated to the RC bugfix. Please prepare a targetted fix that > > can be uploaded to testing-proposed-updates. (Apparently the upstream > > tarball just needs repacked without the jar?)
> Sorry Steve, I didn't think there was still a possibility for getting this > into etch. It's an RC bug, it needs to be fixed for etch if tuxguitar is to be included in etch. :) > Any suggestions on what we should use for an upstream tarball version > number for the 0.8 sans the janel-ant jar? (0.8~dfsg perhaps?) 0.8dfsg, maybe? I don't know if 0.8~dfsg would work, but at least as an upstream version number that would sort earlier than 0.8 so doesn't really seem appropriate. 0.8dfsg would still sort before 0.8.1. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
