On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:19:54PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Hrm, just found out that at least dmenu suffers from the same utf > breackage as dwm before 2.1-2 does (maybe some others too, needs > checking too). dmenu needs also a ~10 line fix. Will prepare package on > thursday, no time before.
While I understand that this is mainly a placeholder bug to remind yourself of the issue, it would be helpful if you could in fact write _what_ the issue is. After searching a bit, I found out that dwm 2.1-2 was uploaded to testing-proposed-updates (that explains why it's not mentioned in the changelog), but #402671 is not any more forthcoming that this bug report, and the "99-utf.patch" in the package also just says "fix utf support". Half of it seems to be mucking around with the X pointer anyhow... (It does remove a few setlocale(foo, "") calls, but what that fixes is non-obvious to me.) As you haven't uploaded the package, we're now left with the situation that there's an RC bug in the BTS that nobody but you actually knows what is about, and thus it's a bit hard to get it fixed :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
