On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > >This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > >#339141: bugs.debian.org: Archived bugs are still displayed, > >which was filed against the bugs.debian.org package. > > > >It has been closed by Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Hi, I guess the merge of #326774 and #339141 caused that both bugs > have been closed. But before I start a reopen-close ping pong I > would like to ask you: Bug #339141 is definitely not closed by the > change because it was not the string that marked a bug as archived > it is the fact that archived bugs are listed on the web page if they > are excluded by the request (archive=no).
The bug in #339141 is that you saw the "archived" string when the bug reports were not actually archived. Bugs which are actually archived are not present in the same bug database as unarchived bugs, and can't possibly be displayed in that report without archive=yes. (And you didn't even ask a question...) The message by A. Costa is wrong, because it's using archived=yes instead of archive=yes. [There's a typo in pkgreport.cgi which I've fixed here, but have to deploy to b.d.o still.] Don Armstrong -- Information wants to be free to kill again. -- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
