I'm sorry. Please feel free to disable the patch; I'm thinking it was not a
good idea to apply it in the package before it was merged upstream (as it was
about to, last time I visited this).
Apologises for the hassle.
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 06:07:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> reopen 363381
> # kfreebsd support patch broke parted in a RC way.
> thanks
>
> Hi Robert, debian-release, debian-boot folk.
>
> The patch in 363381, and particularly this hunk :
>
> diff -urNad parted-1.7.0~/parted/table.c parted-1.7.0/parted/table.c
> --- parted-1.7.0~/parted/table.c 2006-05-19 03:54:01.000000000 -0300
> +++ parted-1.7.0/parted/table.c 2006-05-19 03:54:36.000000000 -0300
> @@ -197,7 +215,11 @@
> len += wcslen(COLSUFFIX);
>
> newsize = (wcslen(*s) + len + 1) * sizeof(wchar_t);
> + oldsize = (wcslen(*s) + 1) * sizeof(wchar_t);
> +
> + temps = *s;
> *s = realloc (*s, newsize);
> + memcpy(*s, temps, oldsize);
>
> for (i = 0; i < ncols; ++i)
> {
>
> Caused the bug in #392767: [mac] parted is unable to reread partition tables
> created by d-i/partman, which was visible on s390 and x86 also accordying to
> Bastian Blank, and thus caused parted to randomly not show the partition table
> on a print command, thus breaking the lvm/raid support, which used
> command-line parted in order to detect lvm/raid partitions.
>
> The problem seems related to the ENABLE_NLS case, and the use of wide-chars,
> which the memcpy trick failed to copy over properly, leaving garbage in the
> string to be outputed.
>
> I remember (but am not anymore 100% sure, so a reply from frans/joeyh would
> be nice), that frans told me last week or so, that an upload of parted was ok
> with regard to d-i RC1, since parted is not in the image, and not migrated to
> testing, but i would like confirmation on this, and also advice from the
> debian-release folk, thus posting here.
>
> I propose to upload parted 1.7.1-3, which includes the two following changes :
>
> parted (1.7.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * parted-print-name.dpatch : Fix bug in parted print, when there are no
> extended partitions, but partition names.
> * disabled kfreebsd-gnu.dpatch, which added kfreebsd support, because the
> the patch caused parted to have trouble in a d-i environment to print
> the
> partition table, thus causing tools relying on parted -s print to find
> information about the partition table to break, like the one checking
> for
> RAID partitions in d-i. (Closes: #392767)
>
> -- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:45:28 +0100
>
> #392767 being one of the two parted related RC bugs still open, but the other
> patch is also nice to have, since it allows to have partitions actually named
> something else than primary, which may (or not) break some tools also.
>
> Robert, we will upload a parted version without kfreebsd support, but it would
> be nice if you could revisit the patch, and clean up this problem. Maybe
> documenting the hacks like the one above a bit better, and/or adding *BSD
> specific #ifdefs to limit this kind of problems would be nice.
>
> Special thanks go to Bastian Blank, who helped me in the last step of
> investigating this issue, and finding the responsible patch.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
>
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
