Your message dated Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:47:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#393039: fixed in gpart 0.1h-4.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: gpart Version: 0.1h-4 Severity: serious I don't know if this is a bug in your package or in the linux-kernel-headers but I assume you're doing something you shouldn't be doing in userspace. > Automatic build of gpart_0.1h-4 on chico by sbuild/i386 0.49 ... > gcc -Wall -O2 -pedantic -DVERSION=\"0.1h\" -g -c -o l64seek.o l64seek.c > l64seek.c:29: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before '_llseek' > l64seek.c:29: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'fd' > l64seek.c:29: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'hi' > l64seek.c:29: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'lo' > l64seek.c:29: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'res' > l64seek.c:29: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'wh' > l64seek.c:34: warning: return type defaults to 'int' > l64seek.c: In function '_syscall5': > l64seek.c:35: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before > '{' token > l64seek.c:59: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before > '{' token > l64seek.c:76: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before > '{' token > l64seek.c:29: error: parameter name omitted > l64seek.c:29: error: parameter name omitted > l64seek.c:29: error: parameter name omitted > l64seek.c:29: error: parameter name omitted > l64seek.c:29: error: parameter name omitted > l64seek.c:29: error: parameter name omitted > l64seek.c:80: error: expected '{' at end of input > make[2]: *** [l64seek.o] Error 1 -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: gpart Source-Version: 0.1h-4.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gpart, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gpart_0.1h-4.1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gpart/gpart_0.1h-4.1.diff.gz gpart_0.1h-4.1.dsc to pool/main/g/gpart/gpart_0.1h-4.1.dsc gpart_0.1h-4.1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gpart/gpart_0.1h-4.1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gpart package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:50:42 +0100 Source: gpart Binary: gpart Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.1h-4.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gpart - Guess PC disk partition table, find lost partitions Closes: 212989 225578 246989 294836 322256 393039 Changes: gpart (0.1h-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * NMU from the Cambridge BSP * Rather than attempt to use the syscall(!) interface for 64-bit lseek, simply compile to use the 64-bit VFS interface and use the normal lseek calls. Let libc deal with the issues... Closes: #225578, #294836, #393039. * Applied the reiserfs 3.6 recognition patch from ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/misc-patches/gpart-0.1h-reiserfs-3.6.patch.gz Closes: #246989, #322256 * Recogniise ext3 filesystems as well as ext2. Thanks to Xisco Calafat for the patch. Closes: #212989 Files: 9232c2b793258a6b44aac688fbffb4f8 539 admin optional gpart_0.1h-4.1.dsc af413fbac154a6d138fa97af709d432e 9532 admin optional gpart_0.1h-4.1.diff.gz 4690231eda349138a7df012dad5a3bec 36310 admin optional gpart_0.1h-4.1_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFQ9xgfDt5cIjHwfcRAh4mAKCIFaaxpVQZ+Br2NGyCIhNAch6wSwCgn6gO PKOlPzqERK0hPSx6DEzYF6g= =kjQe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
