On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:51:59PM +0000, Al Stone wrote: > > > Automatic build of libpfm2_2.0-6 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.49
> > > gcc -Wall -I/build/tbm/libpfm2-2.0/libpfm/../include -I. -O2 -g > > > -DCONFIG_PFMLIB_GENERIC -DCONFIG_PFMLIB_ITANIUM -DCONFIG_PFMLIB_ITANIUM2 > > > -c pfmlib_common.c > > > In file included from pfmlib_common.c:38: > > > /build/tbm/libpfm2-2.0/libpfm/../include/perfmon/pfmlib.h:28:30: error: > > > perfmon2/perfmon.h: No such file or directory > > > /build/tbm/libpfm2-2.0/libpfm/../include/perfmon/pfmlib.h:29:38: error: > > > perfmon2/pfmlib_compiler.h: No such file or directory > > > In file included from pfmlib_common.c:38: > > > /build/tbm/libpfm2-2.0/libpfm/../include/perfmon/pfmlib.h:72: error: > > > expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'pfarg_reg_t' > > > make[2]: *** [pfmlib_common.o] Error 1 > > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/libpfm2-2.0/libpfm' > Please see bug#394564 that asks for the removal of the libpfm2 > package. Unless there are objections, I will close this bug as > soon as the RM for the package gets closed. libpfm2 still has multiple reverse-dependencies in testing: qprof, oprofile-source, and pfmon. What is being done about these? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
