Hi, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this is the situation: > > - db2latex-xsl is RC buggy, dead upstream and should be superceded by > dblatex
OK. > - There is only one dependency on it left in the archive (sarge, sid and > testing[1]), and this is cdbs OK. > - cdbs can build its documentation with dblatex as well. The patch for > this is by W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, see > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=327616;msg=25 > > I have refined it (only one small change that was already suggested by > Wolfgang) and attach it again here fo reference. OK, the patch looks fine, at least as far as I can see. > - The problems mentioned later in #327616 by Andreas Hoehnen, the fact > that the PS documentation cannot be created, is not an issue: cdbs > does not want to create PS documentation. Moreover, the error is > small, well-known and easy to fix, I've reported a bug against > dblatex, with a patch. When will that be applied? > Taking this together, I think there is no reason not to apply the > attached patch in an upload of cdbs targetted at testing, and after that > removing db2latex-xsl again (and getting the RC bug count down by 1 > more). Yes, I think this would be a good idea. Peter, could you do this or do you of a reason to postpone this change? Marc -- BOFH #45: virus attack, luser responsible
pgpcWDfWnmuou.pgp
Description: PGP signature
