Frank Küster wrote: > I fail to understand. Or maybe you missed that db2latex-xsl wasn't > just removed recently and temporarily in order to ease some > transition. It has been removed a while ago, and I don't see any > chance of its reinclusion into etch. It seems it is quite dead > upstream (as you might remember, you've researched that yourself, > too), and nobody seems to care for it.
Well, if db2latex-xsl is dead upstream, then whatever we have as source in the archive is the source, so the bug claiming that we don't have the right sources is obsolete. Really, we have other problems right now than setting up a new docbook toolchain because someone doesn't like the translation source files in the old one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
