On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 07:56:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 17/10/06 at 14:37 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > > I'm using a not fully configured nullmailer package, just because I need
> > > a mail-transport-agent in the chroot. It might not help. I'll see if I
> > > can improve the situation and keep you updated.
> > Great. What is the output of
> > /usr/sbin/sendmail -d0 < /dev/null | head -1 | awk '{print $2}'
> > on one of these systems?
> # /usr/sbin/sendmail -d0 < /dev/null
> No recipients were listed.
> I replaced nullmailer with exim, and it built fine.
FWIW, nullmailer is the one MTA in Debian which doesn't implement the LSB
semantics for /usr/sbin/sendmail (see Conflicts: lsb). Dunno if that should
justify downgrading this bug; it's probably easy enough to add a
build-conflicts with nullmailer.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
