Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:28:11 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this bug is "fixed"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hardinfo
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
this package FTBFS in unstable:
hardinfo | hardinfo | 0.3.7pre-4 | unstable | alpha, arm, ia64, m68k,
s390
hardinfo | hardinfo | 0.4.1-2 | unstable | source, amd64, hppa,
i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
hi joey,
thank you for information, but bug #385781 was opened for a few days and
today I received a mail from "Debian testing watch" with the following:
FYI: The status of the hardinfo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.3.7pre-3
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/aba>
#20060917
# FTBFS on a few arches
So hardinfo is already removed from testing. And I will support alpha,
ia64, m68k and s390 but at this moment without author's help.
see you
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 20:36 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> The problem is that hardinfo is not in testing, and will never get in in
> its current state:
>
> hardinfo | 0.3.6-5 | stable | source, i386, powerpc
> hardinfo | 0.3.7pre-4 | unstable | alpha, ia64, m68k, s390
> hardinfo | 0.4.1-2 | unstable | source, amd64, hppa, i386, mips,
> mipsel, powerpc, sparc
>
> It's ok if you can't support alpha, ia64, m68k and s390, but if you want
> hardinfo to reach testing and the next release of Debian, you should
> then ask the ftpmasters for those obsolete builds of it for those
> architectures to be removed. That would let the new version into testing.
>
--
---
Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://agney.linuxhome.com.br
GPG fingerprint: 4B6D C72F 824D CF3B 75AE 6479 0FDF 48D6 59B9 57AE
--- End Message ---
