On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 06:08:27PM +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Yes, essentially on arm64 the expectations of Debian/base-files and > systemd have diverged irremediably on this aspect, and should not be > mixed and matched anymore as it's way too costly to support, and that > includes nspawn+arm64 and dracut+systemd+arm64, and I've taken steps > to try and make sure it doesn't happen (as per your ruling: no > incompatible symlink shall be created), even though there are some > small gaps evidently, but I believe they can be filled.
Note that I am not part of the TC. My interest here is merely as an arm64 user. I'm just coming to this, and I don't yet have the full context. I understand that you just want to get rid of a problem, but making systemd-container an empty package on arm64 is throwing the baby way together with the bath water. I don't have a practical suggestion at the moment, nor a patch, but maybe there is a solution that can be achieved. And maybe someone can discover it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
