On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 1:39 PM Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 09:34:40 +0000, Michael Anderson wrote:
> >Thanks for the previous fix which did work.
> >
> >However it has broken again with libfuse3-4 updating from 3.17.1~rc1-3
> >to 3.17.1-1.
[...]
> Laszlo, I assume this is not the result you expected after updating
> fuse3? In gvfs-fuse_1.57.2-2, the only references to FUSE_CAP are:
>
> client/gvfsfusedaemon.c:  fuse_set_feature_flag(conn, 
> FUSE_CAP_ATOMIC_O_TRUNC);
> client/gvfsfusedaemon.c:  fuse_unset_feature_flag(conn, FUSE_CAP_ASYNC_READ);
>
> which if I understand correctly is the style that is recommended by the
> upstream developers of FUSE. I verified that this worked as intended with
> libfuse3-4_3.17.1~rc1-3, but I can confirm the regression with 3.17.1-1.
 Yes, this is the recommended way to use the feature flag helper
functions. I think the break might be caused by the FUSE_CAP_* enum ->
defines conversion [1]. I need to check, but maybe the bits are
changed? I mean with enum FUSE_CAP_ATOMIC_O_TRUNC might have a value
of x and with defines now it might be value y. As gvfs was compiled
with the former, might use different flags / values with FUSE v3.17.1
- need to check.
But if this is the reason, gvfs will need a binNMU with the final FUSE
v3.17.1 release.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] 
https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/commit/3ae5ca7443348aabad9bc71b9d5b0999f8292379

Reply via email to