Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your time re-checking!
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 02:02:13PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: notfound -1 6.13.5-1~exp1
> Control: fixed -1 6.13.5-1~exp1
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo unreproducible
>
> On 3/1/25 07:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I would like to see this fixed ASAP for unstable but I have now
> > postponed my 6.12.17-1 upload. It would be great if you can confirm if
> > there was just a local problem.
>
> Please go ahead. It works in a clean chroot ... but not in my
> existing one with all^Wmost *-dkms installed ...
Ack in this case I proceed finalizing the unstable upload.
>
> > # dpkg -S resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids
> > linux-kbuild-6.12.16:
> > /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.12.16/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids
> > linux-kbuild-6.13:
> > /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.13/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids
>
> Darn experimental at pin priority 1 ... upgraded only the packages I
> explicitly selected
>
> iU linux-headers-6.13-amd64 6.13.5-1~exp1
> amd64 Header files for Linux 6.13-amd64
> ii linux-kbuild-6.13 6.13.2-1~exp1
> amd64 Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 6.13
>
> No resolve_btfids in that old versions ...
>
> Shouldn't linux-headers-X.Y[.Z]-$flavor have a more strict
> Depends: linux-kbuild-X.Y[.Z] (= ${binary:Version}) ?
>
> Probably only matters in experimental which omits .Z
yes you are right for experimental the version is capped, cf.
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/3282bf29846a0c47a8e01c60c038d29ad17c573d#1deb02069d878e54cd8cdfff584dfd6215f9b13f_648_639
.
So 6.12.17-1 should follow ASAP, working on it now finalizing it.
Again thanks for your time, much appreciated.
Regards,
Salvatore
