On Monday, February 24, 2025 9:40:23 AM MST Andreas Tille wrote: > Source: couriergrey > Version: 0.3.2-5 > Severity: serious > Justification: grab attention of maintainer > X-Debbugs-Cc: Marco Balmer <ma...@balmer.name>, Package Salvaging Team > <team+salv...@tracker.debian.org>, Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> > > Dear maintainer, > > I suggest removing couriergrey from Debian for the following reasons: > > * Bug "#849523 couriergrey needs to be updated for changes in courier-mta" > looks like the package is currently non-functional > * Bug "#728680 couriergrey: It looks like there could be a memory leak" > has no answer from Upstream thus we can't expect to get any answer > and the problem somehow looks RC to me. > * Currently there are no votes in popcon > > https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=couriergrey&show_installed=on > &show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&d at > e_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1 * While courier-mta suggests this package its only > a weak dependency which could be droped (Maintainer in CC)
I am the maintainer of courier-mta. couriergrey is abandoned upstream and is no longer suggested by the upstream courier project. As such, I have just uploaded courier 1.3.13-8, which removes couriergrey from suggests for courier-mta. -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
