Hi. Are there significant differences between the present bug and this one?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091505 With the caveat that I don't fully understanding the perl code in the present bug, the above bug was also misdiagnosed by me as "ftbfs in future" (but later retitled), and maintainer (or NMUer) also tried to use the rationale that "we can assume that the certificates will be ok in the future", which in the end happened not to be a valid rationale. Thanks.
