On 03/02/25 at 23:25 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 23.12.24 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote: > > On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org) wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to > > > build on armhf. > > > > > > This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a > > > regression. Also, there are no known issues on amd64 or arm64 > > > according to recent (a couple days ago) rebuilds. > > > > > > > This seems to be caused by #1085120, although the bug is for armel. > > The phenomena are about the same. I mark this bug as blocked by the > > other and wait for gs 10.00.05 . > > > > Currently gs 10.00.05 does not exists and even if it will be released > tomorrow, I have doubt that it will make it into trixie. > > Would it be allowed to simply drop the architechtures in question for > trixie and re-include it later?
Hi, I think so. Then it would simply be a matter of asking for the removal of binary packages on armhf. Lucas