On 03/02/25 at 23:25 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 23.12.24 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> > On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org) wrote:
> 
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to
> > > build on armhf.
> > > 
> > > This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a
> > > regression.  Also, there are no known issues on amd64 or arm64
> > > according to recent (a couple days ago) rebuilds.
> > > 
> > 
> > This seems to be caused by #1085120, although the bug is for armel.
> > The phenomena are about the same. I mark this bug as blocked by the
> > other and wait for gs 10.00.05 .
> > 
> 
> Currently gs 10.00.05 does not exists and even if it will be released
> tomorrow, I have doubt that it will make it into trixie.
> 
> Would it be allowed to simply drop the architechtures in question for
> trixie and re-include it later?

Hi,

I think so. Then it would simply be a matter of asking for the removal
of binary packages on armhf.

Lucas

Reply via email to