Hello, On Wed 18 Dec 2024 at 11:27pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Hi Sean, > > Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes: > >> Source: dap-mode >> Version: 0.7-5 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: Policy 2.3, 4.5, 12.5 >> >> Dear maintainer, >> >> Sorry I missed this during RFS review, but d/copyright is wrong >> regarding CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, which has its own license and copyright. >> > > Question for my own understanding: is a code of conduct considered a > type of license? Some initial Googling suggests that a code of conduct > is not a license (but they also don't claim their certainty on the > matter.) Personally I also have some doubt, as a code of conduct doesn't > seem to state how a software is used or distributed, but how the > developers and users should interact as people. > > If a code of conduct is not consider a license, then I see no issue > here, as there is not any separate explicit license specifically for > this file. No, the text of the file has its own license and copyright holders. See the file itself, at the end. -- Sean Whitton