Hello,

On Wed 18 Dec 2024 at 11:27pm -08, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes:
>
>> Source: dap-mode
>> Version: 0.7-5
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: Policy 2.3, 4.5, 12.5
>>
>> Dear maintainer,
>>
>> Sorry I missed this during RFS review, but d/copyright is wrong
>> regarding CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, which has its own license and copyright.
>>
>
> Question for my own understanding: is a code of conduct considered a
> type of license?  Some initial Googling suggests that a code of conduct
> is not a license (but they also don't claim their certainty on the
> matter.) Personally I also have some doubt, as a code of conduct doesn't
> seem to state how a software is used or distributed, but how the
> developers and users should interact as people.
>
> If a code of conduct is not consider a license, then I see no issue
> here, as there is not any separate explicit license specifically for
> this file.

No, the text of the file has its own license and copyright holders.  See
the file itself, at the end.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Reply via email to