Hello László, did you have the chance to review my e-mail? It would be great if we could finally resolve this.
If you have any questions, simply ask and I can support you by doing
an friendly NMU, so you can save your work for other packages.
Am Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 05:34:21PM +0000 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> Am Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 08:10:22PM +0200 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS):
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 6:33 PM Helge Kreutzmann <deb...@helgefjell.de>
> > wrote:
> > > If anything is unclear, I'm happy to resolve this.
> > I started the update back then. Soon I got stuck, the current state
> > is online [1]. The pod can't be processed and in the next few days I
> > don't have time to look at it.
>
> Yes, this build failure is expected:
> "/usr/bin/perl" -MExtUtils::MY -e 'MY->fixin(shift)' --
> blib/script/apt-src
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'man/apt-src.es.pod', needed by
> 'manifypods'. Stop.
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/astest/apt-src-0.25.4'
>
> (This is after I faked more strings in de.po).
>
> The build system "as is" does not deal with incomplete translations,
> see the Makefile line 421:
>
> manifypods : pure_all config \
> man/apt-src.de.pod \
> man/apt-src.es.pod \
> man/apt-src.fr.pod \
> man/apt-src.nl.pod \
> man/apt-src.pod \
> man/apt-src.pt.pod
> $(NOECHO) $(POD2MAN) --section=$(MAN1EXT) --perm_rw=$(PERM_RW) -u \
> man/apt-src.de.pod man/apt-src.de.1 \
> man/apt-src.es.pod man/apt-src.es.1 \
> man/apt-src.fr.pod man/apt-src.fr.1 \
> man/apt-src.nl.pod man/apt-src.nl.1 \
> man/apt-src.pod man/apt-src.1 \
> man/apt-src.pt.pod man/apt-src.pt.1
>
> Once I get your go, I will request all translations to be updated
> again, and given that apt-src.1 is rather static, this problem should
> not occur in practice. It only happens now, as I updated apt-src.1 but
> not the translations.
>
> So my proposal is to ignore this problem. For testing, you can fake
> entries in the de.po, es.po, fr.po and nl.po. As said earlier, once
> you approve the patch, the translations will return to 100%. If some
> new translations should arrive, it will be 100% and you will need to
> update this piece of the Makefile.
>
> Of course, this can be done dynamic. But given the static nature of
> this package, I don't think it is worth the effort, but if you are
> interested, its documented in po4a(1).
>
> So my proposal is to first get this package back in shape and testing.
> Making the Makefile dynamic would be the next step, which you can work
> on after I "left" taking care and with properly i18n in testing.
>
> Would that be fine for your?
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
