Quoting Matthias Geiger (2024-07-07 11:21:07) > On 07.07.24 10:10, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > [...] > >> Patching sluice seems not trivial. Given that it's sole rdep is isahc, > >> would you be ok with me filing a RM request for it if I patch isahc to > >> use standard rust pipes ? imo this is the easiest option going forward. > >> The code changes look more doable than patching sluice. > > > > I would ertainly be happy getting help with isahc, but I don't quite > > understand what you are proposing concretely - how will patching isahc > > also require an RM request?!? > isahc requires sluice only for some pipe functionality in two files. > Since patching sluice proves to be hard I'd > > opt to patch isahc to use something like stdio::piped() rather than > sluice::pipe. Then I can file a RM request for sluice since it's not > used elsewhere and we can finish this transition.
Makes great sense. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
