Your message dated Mon, 17 Jun 2024 16:35:59 +0000
with message-id <e1sjfkp-0005rl...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1073340: fixed in pd-mrpeach 0.1~svn17672-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1073340,
regarding pd-mrpeach: FTBFS: m_pd.h:85:26: error: static assertion failed: 
"field must be t_float!"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1073340: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073340
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pd-mrpeach
Version: 0.1~svn17672-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240615 ftbfs-trixie

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -DPD -I "/usr/include/pd" -DPD_FLOATSIZE=64 -DUNIX -Wdate-time 
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC  -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -o sqosc~/sqosc~.linux-amd64-64.so.o 
> -c sqosc~/sqosc~.c
> ++++ info: making cmos/cd4001.linux-amd64-64.so.o in lib mrpeach
> In file included from sqosc~/sqosc~.c:10:
> sqosc~/sqosc~.c: In function ‘sqosc_tilde_setup’:
> /usr/include/pd/m_pd.h:85:26: error: static assertion failed: "field must be 
> t_float!"
>    85 | #define PD_STATIC_ASSERT _Static_assert
>       |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /usr/include/pd/m_pd.h:575:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘PD_STATIC_ASSERT’
>   575 |     PD_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(((type *)NULL)->field) == 
> sizeof(t_float), "field must be t_float!"); \
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> sqosc~/sqosc~.c:343:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘CLASS_MAINSIGNALIN’
>   343 |     CLASS_MAINSIGNALIN(sqosc_class, t_sqosc, x_f);/* x_f is used when 
> no signal is input */
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc -DPD -I "/usr/include/pd" -DPD_FLOATSIZE=64 -DUNIX -Wdate-time 
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC  -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 
> -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. 
> -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat 
> -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -o cmos/cd4001.linux-amd64-64.so.o -c 
> cmos/cd4001.c
> ++++ info: making net/udpsndrcv.linux-amd64-64.so.o in lib mrpeach
> make[1]: *** [/usr/share/pd-lib-builder//Makefile.pdlibbuilder:987: 
> sqosc~/sqosc~.linux-amd64-64.so.o] Error 1


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/06/15/pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17672-5_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240615;users=lu...@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240615&fusertaguser=lu...@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pd-mrpeach
Source-Version: 0.1~svn17672-6
Done: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlae...@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pd-mrpeach, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1073...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlae...@debian.org> (supplier of updated 
pd-mrpeach package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:11:18 +0200
Source: pd-mrpeach
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1~svn17672-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <debian-multime...@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlae...@debian.org>
Closes: 1073340
Changes:
 pd-mrpeach (0.1~svn17672-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix FTBFS with Pd64 (Closes: #1073340)
   * Add 'Provides' stanza
   * Switch to dh-sequence-puredata
   * Bump standards version to 4.7.0
Checksums-Sha1:
 e6e6d924273c5c27b7dde7646b669774f84b3174 2485 pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17672-6.dsc
 42cf6e3f381dc8f1fbfed2ed389fe897e6056f8f 36264 
pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17672-6.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 1092e4be5c0b067c69d70120546b80ddefc61d073611d1dc1f4e04777ef9bd0c 2485 
pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17672-6.dsc
 138875b26475884fbd4bd6d358cb147577128db62b2656f17efc48c6bfed4889 36264 
pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17672-6.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 78ee250a2889b93d408cc507009a0a2e 2485 sound optional 
pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17672-6.dsc
 6ee5c9e25814c619eec90796dcd03a5f 36264 sound optional 
pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17672-6.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=FCCA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: pgpyix3kzyEX0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to