Control: tags -1 - pending Hi,
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 19:10:57 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser <t.gla...@qvest-digital.com> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2024, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > >Better prevent this from landing in trixie until the package > >gets its soname bumped. > > In fact, unless someone has the tuits to diff every single > API and ABI surface of the package between trixie (ideally > bookworm) and sid versions, it would be best if any package > built against libxml2 >2.12 be binNMU’d in trixie, and once > 2.12 is renamed to libxml3 or something, they are to be rebuilt > in sid anyway. > > Who knows what other API and ABI breaks are hiding herein… > > bye, > //mirabilos > It looks that this libxml2 update is causing more troubles than expected, I would like to ask for your opinion whether it's better to revert to an older version for the moment? The LibreOffice break stuff isn't a real API/ABI break, it was caused by default build options being changed so that some features were intentionally disabled by upstream... I can try to dig further about the surface of API/ABI changes, but I have to say that would take some time to complete. Thanks, Aron
