On Monday 21 August 2006 17:06, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> Btw, seemingly you're using ntfsprogs 1.12.1. Can you reproduce this
> with 1.13.1 as well? Though there shouldn't be any difference in the
> outcome, whatever is the ntfsresize version.

Yes, I have done previous tests using 1.13.1 too, indeed with no 
difference in behavior. I have just upgraded my test system from etch to 
sid, so all my following tests will use 1.13.1 again.

> I just noticed that apparently you use vmware. Do you have this problem
> also on real computers? Because it's a bit strange that ntfsresize
> worked with vista so far. So the problem may be in vmware, not vista or
> ntfsresize.

Yes, all my previous tests have been on real hardware (an em64t box).
I have just switched to vmware so I don't have to reinstall Vista every 
time when I need to go back (which takes *way* to long...). The issue and 
behavior is identical.
This also confirms that the issue is not 32-bit / 64-bit related and in 
vmware I'm running i386.

Attachment: pgprYqELIRMUj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to