Source: apertium-oc-es
Version: 1.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.oc.metadix 
> >.deps/oc.metadix
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.es.dix >.deps/es.dix
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.oc-es.dix 
> >.deps/oc-es.dix
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.post-es.dix 
> >.deps/es.post.dix
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.post-oc.dix 
> >.deps/oc.post.dix
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc@aran alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.oc.metadix 
> >.deps/[email protected]
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc@aran alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.es.dix 
> >.deps/[email protected]
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc@aran alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.oc-es.dix 
> >.deps/[email protected]
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc@aran alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.post-es.dix 
> >.deps/[email protected]
> xsltproc --stringparam alt oc@aran alt.xsl apertium-oc-es.post-oc.dix 
> >.deps/[email protected]
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/es.post.dix
> lt-comp lr .deps/es.post.dix oc-es.autopgen.bin
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/oc.post.dix
> main@standard 69 144
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/[email protected]
> lt-comp lr .deps/oc.post.dix es-oc.autopgen.bin
> lt-comp lr .deps/[email protected] [email protected]
> main@standard 69 144
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/[email protected]
> main@standard 500 1206
> lt-comp lr .deps/[email protected] [email protected]
> main@standard 297 930
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/[email protected]
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/[email protected]
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/oc-es.dix
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/oc-es.dix
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/es.dix
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/es.dix
> lt-comp rl .deps/[email protected] [email protected]
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/[email protected]
> lt-comp lr .deps/[email protected] [email protected]
> lt-comp lr .deps/oc-es.dix oc-es.autobil.bin
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/[email protected]
> lt-comp rl .deps/oc-es.dix es-oc.autobil.bin
> lt-comp rl .deps/es.dix oc-es.autogen.bin
> lt-comp lr .deps/es.dix es-oc.automorf.bin
> lt-comp lr .deps/[email protected] [email protected]
> final@inconditional 12 64
> main@standard 22954 33867
> lt-comp rl .deps/[email protected] [email protected]
> xsltproc buscaPar.xsl .deps/oc.metadix | uniq >$$tmp1 && \
> xsltproc $$tmp1 .deps/oc.metadix > .deps/oc.dix && rm $$tmp1
> final@inconditional 12 64
> final@inconditional 12 64
> main@standard 23057 33987
> main@standard 24478 36552
> xsltproc buscaPar.xsl .deps/[email protected] | uniq >$$tmp1 && \
> xsltproc $$tmp1 .deps/[email protected] > .deps/[email protected] && rm $$tmp1
> final@inconditional 12 64
> main@standard 25392 38095
> final@inconditional 12 65
> main@standard 17916 37761
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/oc.dix
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/oc.dix
> final@inconditional 12 65
> main@standard 17697 37125
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/[email protected]
> apertium-validate-dictionary .deps/[email protected]
> final@inconditional 12 65
> final@inconditional 12 65
> main@standard 17916 37761
> main@standard 17697 37125
> .deps/oc.dix:9946: element pardef: Schemas validity error : Element 'pardef': 
> Duplicate key-sequence ['conselh__n'] in unique identity-constraint 
> 'pardef-unique'.
> .deps/oc.dix:9946: element pardef: Schemas validity error : Element 'pardef': 
> Duplicate key-sequence ['conselh__n'] in unique identity-constraint 
> 'pardef-unique'.
> .deps/[email protected]:10241: element pardef: Schemas validity error : Element 
> 'pardef': Duplicate key-sequence ['conselh__n'] in unique identity-constraint 
> 'pardef-unique'.
> .deps/[email protected]:10241: element pardef: Schemas validity error : Element 
> 'pardef': Duplicate key-sequence ['conselh__n'] in unique identity-constraint 
> 'pardef-unique'.
> lt-comp lr .deps/oc.dix oc-es.automorf.bin
> lt-comp rl .deps/oc.dix es-oc.autogen.bin
> lt-comp rl .deps/[email protected] [email protected]
> lt-comp lr .deps/[email protected] [email protected]
> final@inconditional 12 65
> main@standard 17852 35721
> apostrophes@postblank 973 1430
> final@inconditional 12 65
> main@standard 20999 45351
> final@inconditional 12 65
> main@standard 20127 38676
> apostrophes@postblank 1109 1501
> final@inconditional 12 65
> main@standard 23117 47311
> apertium-regtest test
> Corpus 1 of 4: es-oc
>   1/6 (16.67%) tests pass (0/1 (0.0%) match gold)
> 
> Corpus 2 of 4: es-oc@aran
>   1/5 (20.0%) tests pass (0/1 (0.0%) match gold)
> 
> Corpus 3 of 4: oc-es
>   1/7 (14.29%) tests pass (0/1 (0.0%) match gold)
> 
> Corpus 4 of 4: oc@aran-es
>   1/9 (11.11%) tests pass (0/1 (0.0%) match gold)
> 
> There were changes! Rerun in interactive mode to update tests.
> Changed corpora: es-oc, es-oc@aran, oc-es, oc@aran-es
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:946: test] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 
> returned exit code 2


The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/01/15/apertium-oc-es_1.0.8-1_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240115;[email protected]
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240115&[email protected]&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

Reply via email to