also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.10.1400 +0100]: > Could you please try mdadm 2.5.3-1~unreleased.3 ? > > It adds the udev rules because mdadm seems to create the device > nodes even for devices that have already been assembled now. This is > not a final fix but I'd like to get confirmation on this behaviour. > > http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3.dsc > http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.deb
I've "released" 2.5.3-1~unreleased.4. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4_i386.deb It now uses udev again but also adds a script that tries to determine whether /dev/md/X is in use (for each node). If it cannot determine that, it uses /dev/mdX. Awaiting your feedback. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
