Your message dated Wed, 9 Aug 2006 23:12:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376399: needs a simple rebuild.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libregexp-pp-ocaml-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0.0-2

Hi

Your package is not installable as it depends on ocaml-nox-3.09.1 which
is not available anymore. You might want to update the dependency to
ocaml-nox-3.09.2

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:42:49PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> 
> You said to look at the RC list and submit some patches - I've done one
> so far (#379214) and when I test built this one, it fixed the bug simply
> be rebuilding it. No patch required, it simply needs an NMU.

> Not much point me putting a .deb in my repository (although I can if you
> want), but if you fancy uploading probably the easiest RC NMU you'll
> ever do . . . .

> It'll look strange if I add a comment to the bug report that it needs a
> rebuild but I can't do it myself.

> Or should the RC bug itself be closed? The package will be rebuilt as
> soon as a build is needed. Will the archive accept an NMU that doesn't
> actually change anything?

In fact, this package has already been binNMUed on 11/12 architectures and
no longer depends on the old ocaml packages there; and I've just given
regexp-pp back for building on arm, so it should be fixed there shortly as
well.  So yes, let's go ahead and close this bug.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to