notfound 1036967 1:3.2.7a-5 notfound 1036967 1:3.2.8-3 notfound 1036967 1:3.2.8b-3 thanks
On Wed, 31 May 2023, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from > 'jessie-elts'. > It installed fine in 'jessie-elts', then the upgrade to 'stretch-elts' fails > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a > Breaks+Replaces relation. > > See policy 7.6 at > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces > > >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > ... > Selecting previously unselected package fig2dev. > Preparing to unpack .../fig2dev_1%3a3.2.6a-2+deb9u4_amd64.deb ... > Unpacking fig2dev (1:3.2.6a-2+deb9u4) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/fig2dev_1%3a3.2.6a-2+deb9u4_amd64.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fig2dev', which is also in package transfig > 1:3.2.6a-2~deb8u1 > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) > .. > The upload of a new upstream release (1:3.2.6a-2~deb8u1) of transfig to > jessie-elts (ELA-493-1) invalidated the versions in the existing > Breaks+Replaces: transfig (<< 1:3.2.6~beta-1~) > in fig2dev (1:3.2.6a-2+deb9u4) in stretch, causing the above file overwrite > errors on > several jessie-elts -> stretch-elts upgrade tests. I switched over from transfig to fig2dev with version 1:3.2.6~beta-1, it was never intended that someone builds a transfig 1:3.2.6a-2~deb8u1. If someone needs a 3.2.6a backport in jessie, the package should have been renamed as I did (transfig becoming a transitional package after 1:3.2.6~beta-1). Anyway this went wrong in jessie-elts and has to be solved in stretch-elts now, I suppose. > Ideally the Breaks+Replaces against transfig in fig2dev > should be bumped to (<< 1:3.2.6a-2+deb9) in stretch-elts. Since it isn't an issue in buster/bullseye/bookworm I mark these versions fixed to avoid confusion in the release team. Greetings Roland
