Hi,
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 09:42:36 +0000 Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > snip > > Is there consensus among Japanese-speaking users of Debian that mozc is > a better default for all Japanese speakers, including new users who are > not familiar with GNOME or Debian? At least, there is the fact that bullseye's default choice is ibus-mozc for Japanese users. > I want to avoid changing this from anthy to mozc-jp, and then getting a > second bug report from a different Japanese user saying that we need to > change it back! > > Looking at #984875 and #983653, I also see a mention of mozc only being > available on certain architectures: it's available on x86, ARM and riscv64, > but not on mips*el, ppc64el or s390x. > > How does this interact with the default being mozc-jp? Do we need to use > a #ifdef to make the default be mozc on architectures that have it, and > anthy on architectures that don't? Surely, it may be better to modify the patch to consider non-available mozc on certain architectures. > I'm also concerned that mozc still depends on GTK 2 (a switch to GTK > 3 was tried and then reverted, see #967641). This is OK for bookworm, > but will probably not be supportable in Debian 13. I didn't noticed that issue. Thank you. > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 15:09:15 +0900, ken...@xdump.org wrote: > > Thus with attached patch, gnome-initial-setup will not > > show label for mozc-jp as "日本語 (Mozc)" by default. > > What would be the best label to be displayed there? > IMHO, 日本語 (Mozc). > What is actually displayed instead? > As I mentioned already, "mozc-jp". > > To display label correctly, fetch_ibus_engines_result must be called > > in advance. > > That's probably not possible: fetch_ibus_engines_result is called > asynchronously with the result of a D-Bus method call, so it's already > called as early as possible, and before that point we don't have the > necessary information. Currently, I agree with you. Regards,
