On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:05:41AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: >... > Instead, turning on this feature should be postponed for the next release > cycle > where a proper transition can be done. >...
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:02:11PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: >... > You completely miss the point here. It would lead to exactly the same > situation if 2.07 would be the *first* to support it and could be > shipped with Bookworm as long as e2fsprogs makes this breaking change > now. But it makes a huge difference if 2.07 with a fix is released in > around the same time as Bookworm and can spread until Trixie is > prepared and the breaking change is postponed to Trixie. >... You are contradicting yourself by first unconditionally approving making the change in trixie, but later trying to make this conditional on grub making a new upstream release around the same time as Bookworm. We can only control what is in Debian releases, we cannot be waiting for godot^Wgrub making a new release before making a change in Debian. The best default assumption when discussing whether the change should be made in bookworm or trixie is that there will be no new grub release during the next 2 years - it's only 2 years since the latest release and there was even a 5 year gap between 2.00 and 2.02. > Daniel cu Adrian
