Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2022 09:58:49 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020194,
regarding binutils: FTBFS: make[5]: *** [Makefile:932: check-DEJAGNU] Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1020194: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020194
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: binutils
Version: 2.38.90.20220713-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/builddir-single/gprofng'
> /bin/grep -E "(development|experimental)="
> ../../gprofng/../bfd/development.sh \
> | mawk -F= '{ print "set " $1 " " $2 }' > development.exp
> Making a new site.exp file ...
> srcroot=`cd ../../gprofng && pwd`; export srcroot; \
> r=`pwd`; export r; \
> LC_ALL=C; export LC_ALL; \
> EXPECT=expect; export EXPECT; \
> jdk_inc=""; export jdk_inc; \
> runtest=runtest; \
> if /bin/bash -c "$runtest --version" > /dev/null 2>&1; then \
> $runtest --tool gprofng --srcdir ${srcroot}/testsuite \
> GPROFNG_BROKEN_JAVAC="no" \
> MAKE="/usr/bin/make VERSION=-system" CC="x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc"
> CFLAGS="-g -O2 -pthread" \
> LDFLAGS="" LIBS=" " \
> BUILDDIR="/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/builddir-single/gprofng" ; \
> else echo "WARNING: could not find \`runtest'" 1>&2; :;\
> fi
> WARNING: Couldn't find tool init file
> Test run by user42 on Sat Sep 17 20:01:36 2022
> Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>
> === gprofng tests ===
>
> Schedule of variations:
> unix
>
> Running target unix
> Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
> target.
> Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
> Using /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/gprofng/testsuite/config/default.exp as
> tool-and-target-specific interface file.
> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/display.exp ...
> ERROR: compilation of test program in jsynprog failed
> ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed
> ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed
>
> === gprofng Summary ===
>
> # of unresolved testcases 3
> make[5]: *** [Makefile:932: check-DEJAGNU] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/09/17/binutils_2.38.90.20220713-2_unstable.log
All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220917;[email protected]
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220917&[email protected]&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.39-6
--- End Message ---
