Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > You can't rely on the size of an int or a long int. If the code doesn't > cope with changes of size on those types, then it needs to use special > types harcoding the size.
Thank you. I think that this may be the right solution to get rid of the issues linked to the fuzzyness of the data types. > In this case "int" have the same size on i386 and amd64 (32bits) but "long > int" don't (i386: 32bits, amd64: 64bits). > > The correct patch is not to replace those "long int" by "int" but by > "int32_t" to ensure the size (for this you need to include the header > <stdint.h>). > > Georges, can you update the patch accordingly and provide a new version of > the source package ? OK, the new package has been uploaded, see http://debian.ofset.org/dists/etch/main/source/wims_3.56-5.dsc Best regards, Georges.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature