Your message dated Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:27:02 +0000
with message-id <e1ocmvk-000h57...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1014698: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #941264,
regarding phpunit breaks php-cache-lite autopkgtest: tries to write to 
/usr/bin/.phpunit.result.cache
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
941264: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941264
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: phpunit, php-cache-lite
Control: found -1 phpunit/8.3.5-1
Control: found -1 php-cache-lite/1.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update

Dear maintainers,

With a recent upload of phpunit the autopkgtest of php-cache-lite fails
in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
phpunit from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from
testing. In tabular form:
                       pass            fail
phpunit                from testing    8.3.5-1
php-cache-lite         from testing    1.8.2-1
versioned deps [0]     from testing    from unstable
all others             from testing    from testing

I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. It seems the
test now tries to write in /usr/bin, which is obviously not good.

Currently this regression is blocking the migration of phpunit to
testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?

More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation

Paul

[0] You can see what packages were added from the second line of the log
file quoted below. The migration software adds source package from
unstable to the list if they are needed to install packages from
phpunit/8.3.5-1. I.e. due to versioned dependencies or breaks/conflicts.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=phpunit

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/php-cache-lite/3027486/log.gz

autopkgtest [02:12:32]: test command1: [-----------------------
PHPUnit 8.3.5 by Sebastian Bergmann and contributors.

........................                                          24 /
24 (100%)PHP Warning:
file_put_contents(/usr/bin/.phpunit.result.cache): failed to open
stream: Permission denied in
/usr/share/php/PHPUnit/Runner/DefaultTestResultCache.php on line 108


Time: 15.44 seconds, Memory: 4.00 MB

OK (24 tests, 30 assertions)
autopkgtest [02:12:48]: test command1: -----------------------]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.8.2-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package php-cache-lite has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1014698

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to